J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on January 24, 2008, doi:10.1177/0091270007312903

The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2008;48:303.

© 2008 the American College of Clinical Pharmacology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (JCP OnlineFirst[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0091270007312903v1
48/3/303    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kovarik, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schmouder, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kovarik, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schmouder, R. L.
©© 2008 American College of Clinical Pharmacology, Inc.
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology , 10.1177/0091270007312903


Article

A Mechanistic Study to Assess Whether Isoproterenol Can Reverse the Negative Chronotropic Effect of Fingolimod

John M. Kovarik 1*, Gilles-Jacques Riviere 1, Daniel Neddermann 1, Steve Maton , Thomas L. Hunt 2, and Robert L. Schmouder 1

1 Novartis Pharmaceuticals
2 PPD Development Clinics

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: john.kovarik{at}pharma.novartis.com.


   Abstract
The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator fingolimod (FTY720) elicits a negative chronotropic effect at treatment initiation that attenuates thereafter. The authors determined whether isoproterenol can counteract this effect. In this randomized, crossover study, 14 healthy subjects received 5 infusions of isoproterenol (titrated to increase heart rate to 100-120 bpm) or intravenous placebo. The first infusion was 2 hours before and the other 4 infusions were between 3 and 6 hours after a 5-mg oral dose of fingolimod. Telemetry and pharmacokinetic data were collected for 24 hours. During isoproterenol infusion 1 (before fingolimod administration), heart rate was increased 80% from preinfusion 68 ± 9 bpm to a maximum 122 ± 15 bpm. Administration of fingolimod decreased heart rate from 73 ± 11 bpm predose to a nadir of 57 ± 8 bpm. The subsequent isoproterenol infusion 2 in the presence of fingolimod increased mean heart rate by 85% to a maximum 105 ± 21 bpm. A 41% higher total isoproterenol dose was needed to increase heart rate to the target range with fingolimod (97 ± 6 mcg) compared with isoproterenol alone (69 ± 27 mcg). Isoproterenol infusions 3 to 5 had similar effects on heart rate as infusion 2. Fingolimod had no significant influence on blood pressure responses to isoproterenol. Isoproterenol did not alter the pharmacokinetics of fingolimod. The pure beta-agonist isoproterenol can reverse the heart rate reduction that occurs transiently after initiating fingolimod treatment.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology