|
|
||||||||
THERAPEUTIC REVIEW |
From the Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota.
Address for correspondence: Zelalem Temesgen, MD, AAHIVS, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Division of Infectious Diseases, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905; e-mail: temesgen.zelalem{at}mayo.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: antiretrovirals HIV nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors protease inhibitors fusion inhibitors
|
| THE REPLICATION CYCLE OF HIV |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
At present, 4 classes of antiretroviral drugs have received FDA approval: nucleoside/nucleotide analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), nonnucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), and fusion inhibitors. Numerous investigational drug candidates both within existing classes as well as within new classes that exploit our understanding of the HIV replication cycle are in various stages of preclinical and clinical development. Among those that are in the final stages of clinical development are integrase and CCR5 inhibitors.
| NUCLEOSIDE/NUCLEOTIDE ANALOG REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITORS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
General characteristics of NRTIs are shown in Table II. Kidneys are the primary route for elimination of all NRTIs. Thus, dose adjustment is required in renal insufficiency for all NRTIs with the exception of abacavir.
|
Table III lists major adverse reactions associated with NRTIs. One notable classwide adverse effect is mitochondrial toxicity, which is responsible for the clinical syndromes of lactic acidosis with hepatic steatosis, peripheral neuropathy, and lipoatrophy. Although this toxicity is a classwide toxicity, stavudine (d4T), didanosine (ddI), and zalcitabine (ddC) are the drugs most frequently associated with it. Lamivudine (3TC), abacavir (ABC), tenofovir (TDF), and emtricitabine (FTC) are the NNRTIs with low mitochondrial toxicity potential.
|
Select drug interactions associated with NRTIs are detailed in Table IV.
|
| NONNUCLEOSIDE REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITORS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Drug interactions are important considerations with NNRTIs.10 Nevirapine (NVP) and efavirenz (EFV) are inducers of the hepatic cytochrome CYP3A4. Delavirdine, on the other hand, inhibits CYP3A4.11 Efavirenz also inhibits CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, albeit to a lesser extent. Both NVP and EFV are metabolized by CYP2B6 as well as CYP3A4. Through this complex interaction with the P450 enzyme system, NNRTIs may change the metabolism of and thus lower (nevirapine, efavirenz) or increase (delavirdine) the plasma levels of coadministered drugs that are metabolized by the cytochrome P450 system. Similarly, drugs that induce or inhibit cytochrome P450 activity may have an effect on the plasma concentrations of NNRTIs. Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors do not require dose adjustment in case of renal insufficiency as their primary route of elimination is hepatic.
The most common side effect associated with all NNRTIs is rash. Rash usually occurs within the first 6 weeks of initiation of therapy and has been noted in up to 35% of patients receiving nevirapine.12,13 Nevirapine is also associated with hepatotoxicity, particularly in women with CD4 counts higher than 250 cells/mm3 and men with CD4 counts above 400 cells/mm3.14,15 The risk of hepatotoxicity is greatest in the first 6 weeks of therapy. However, it may occur at any time during treatment and in some cases may not be reversible with discontinuation of therapy. Rash was observed in approximately half of the patients with symptomatic hepatotoxicity.
Efavirenz, on the other hand, has been commonly associated with central nervous system (CNS) side effects, ranging from dizziness to hallucinations, insomnia, nightmares, and worsening of psychiatric illnesses.16 These CNS side effects are more common during the first 2 weeks of therapy and usually resolve by 24 weeks. Efavirenz also causes fetal malformations in pregnant monkeys and neural tube defects in children of pregnant women who received it.17,18 The risk of hepatotoxicity appears to be less with efavirenz as compared to nevirapine.19
The general characteristics of currently approved NNRTIs are listed in Table V. Table VI lists selected drug interactions associated with NNRTIs.
|
|
| PROTEASE INHIBITORS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Drug interactions are important considerations with the use of PIs. Protease inhibitors are substrates for the cytochrome P450 system (primarily CYP3A4) and are themselves, to varying degrees, inhibitors of this system, with ritonavir being the most potent inhibitor. Some PIs, such as lopinavir and tipranavir, are also inducers of CYP3A4. This leads to a significant number of interactions with drugs that are inducers, inhibitors, or substrates of this system. The inhibitory effect of protease inhibitors on each other's metabolism has led to the evaluation of specific combinations that provide an advantageous pharmacokinetic profile, may delay or prevent the onset of resistance, and allow for dose reductions, more convenient dosing regimens, and less toxicity.22-24 All currently licensed protease inhibitors are commonly prescribed as boosted agents with the exception of nelfinavir, which is not well and reliably augmented by ritonavir. In fact, 3 protease inhibitors—lopinavir, tipranavir, and darunavir—require coadministration with ritonavir to achieve effective serum concentrations. Lopinavir is currently available as a coformulated product, with each tablet containing 200 mg of lopinavir and 50 mg of ritonavir.
General characteristics of currently available protease inhibitors are listed in Table VII. Table VIII lists major adverse reactions associated with PIs. Select drugs that should not be coadministered with PIs are detailed in Table IX. Select drugs that require monitoring or dose adjustment when coadministered with PIs are shown in Table X.
|
|
|
|
| FUSION INHIBITORS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| GUIDELINES ON THE USE OF ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY FOR HIV INFECTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The latest (October 10, 2006) DHHS-recommended preferred regimens for first-line antiretroviral therapy are listed in Table XI. These regimens attained "preferred" status because they have clinical trial data support for their efficacy, durability of effect, tolerability, and ease of use. The regimens are either NNRTI based or PI based with a backbone of 2 NRTI drugs. Efavirenz is the preferred NNRTI, whereas lopinavir/ritonavir, fosamprenavir/ritonavir, and atazanavir/ritonavir are the preferred PIs. Zidovudine or tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine make up the preferred nucleoside backbone. In general, in patients with adequate kidney function, coformulated NRTI products are preferred over single-drug formulations for reasons of reduced pill burden and simplicity of regimen.
|
| SUMMARY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Palella FJ Jr, Delaney KM, Moorman AC, et al. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med. 1998;338: 853-860.
2. Torres RA, Barr M. Impact of combination therapy for HIV infection on inpatient census. N Engl J Med. 1997;336: 1531-1532.
3. Haseltine WA. Molecular biology of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1. FASEB J. 1991;5: 2349-2360.[Abstract]
4. Mitsuya H, Broder S. Inhibition of the in vitro infectivity and cytopathic effect of human T-lymphotropic virus III/lymphadenopathy-associated virus (HTLV III/LAV) by 2,' 3'-dideoxynucleosides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83: 1911-1915.
5. Gao WY, Agbaria R, Driscoll JS, Mitsuya H. Divergent anti-human immunodeficiency virus activity and anabolic phosphorylation of 2,'3'-dideoxynucleoside analogs in resting and activated human cells. J Biol Chem. 1994;269: 12633-12638.
6. Grob PM, Wu JC, Cohen KA, et al. Nonnucleoside inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse-transcriptase: nevirapine as a prototype drug. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1992;8: 145-152.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Merluzzi VJ, Hargrave KD, Labadia M, et al. Inhibition of HIV-1 replication by a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Science. 1990;250: 1411-1413.
8. Spence RA, Kati WM, Anderson KS, et al. Mechanism of inhibition of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase by nonnucleoside inhibitors. Science. 1995;267: 988-993.
9. Witvrouw M, Pannecouque C, Switzer WM, Folks TM, De Clercq E, Heneine W. Susceptibility of HIV-2, SIV and SHIV to various anti-HIV-1 compounds: implications for treatment and postexposure prophylaxis. Antiviral Ther. 2004;9: 57-65.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Ma Q, Okusanya OO, Smith PF, et al. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2005;1: 473-485.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. von Moltke LL, Greenblatt DJ, Granda BW, et al. Inhibition of human cytochrome P450 isoforms by nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;41: 85-91.[Abstract]
12. Pollard RB, Robinson P, Dransfield K. Safety profile of nevirapine, a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clin Ther. 1998;20: 1071-1092.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Ananworanich J, Moor Z, Siangphoe U, et al. Incidence and risk factors for rash in Thai patients randomized to regimens with nevirapine, efavirenz or both drugs. AIDS. 2005;19: 185-192.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Sulkowski MS, Thomas DL, Mehta SH, Chaisson RE, Moore RD. Hepatotoxicity associated with nevirapine or efavirenz-containing antiretroviral therapy: role of hepatitis C and B infections. Hepatology. 2002;35: 182-189.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Nunez M, Lana R, Mendoza JL, Martin-Carbonero L, Soriano V. Risk factors for severe hepatic injury after introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001;27: 426-431.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Blanch J, Martinez E, Rousaud A, et al. Preliminary data of a prospective study on neuropsychiatric side effects after initiation of efavirenz. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2001;27: 336-343.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. De Santis M, Carducci B, De Santis L, Cavaliere AF, Straface G. Periconceptional exposure to efavirenz and neural tube defects. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162: 355.
18. Fundaro C, Genovese O, Rendeli C, Tamburrini E, Salvaggio E. Myelomeningocele in a child with intrauterine exposure to efavirenz. AIDS. 2002;16: 299-300.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. van Leth F, Phanuphak P, Ruxrungtham K, et al, and 2NN Study Team. Comparison of first-line antiretroviral therapy with regimens including nevirapine, efavirenz, or both drugs, plus stavudine and lamivudine: a randomised open-label trial, the 2NN Study. Lancet. 2004;363: 1253-1263.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Navia MA, Fitzgerald PMD, McKeever BM, et al. Three-dimensional structure of aspartyl protease from human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1. Nature. 1989;159: 87-94.
21. Pillay D, Bryant M, Getman D, et al. HIV-1 protease inhibitors: their development, mechanism of action and clinical potential. Rev Med Virol. 1995;5: 23-33.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
22. Jackson A, Taylor S, Boffito M. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drug interactions involving HIV-1 protease inhibitors. AIDS Rev. 2004;6: 208-217.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Kempf DJ, Marsh KC, Kumar G, et al. Pharmacokinetic enhancement of inhibitors of the human immunodeficiency virus protease by coadministration with ritonavir. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41: 654-660.[Abstract]
24. Gerber JG. Using pharmacokinetics to optimize antiretroviral drug-drug interactions in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30(suppl 2): S123-S129.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Eckert DM, Kim PS. Mechanism of viral membrane fusion and its inhibition. Annu Rev Biochem. 2001;70: 777-810.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Cooley LA, Lewin SR. HIV-1 cell entry and advances in viral entry inhibitor therapy. J Clin Virol. 2003;26: 121-132.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Trottier B, Walmsley S, Reynes J, et al. Safety of enfuvirtide in combination with an optimized background of antiretrovirals in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected adults over 48 weeks. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;40: 413-421.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Panel on Clinical Practices for Treatment of HIV Infection. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. October 10, 2005. Available at: http:\www.aidsinfo.nih.org.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Giri, S. Agarwal, N. Shaik, G. Pan, Y. Chen, and W. F. Elmquist Substrate-Dependent Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (Bcrp1/Abcg2)-Mediated Interactions: Consideration of Multiple Binding Sites in in Vitro Assay Design Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2009; 37(3): 560 - 570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |