J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and the Journal of New Drugs, 1969; 9:187-194
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Free, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Guthrie, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Free, S. M., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Guthrie, M. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A New Rating Scale for Evaluating Clinical Response in Psychoneurotic Outpatients

Spencer M. Free Jr. Ph.D.1 and Marshall B. Guthrie M.D.1

1 Research and Development Division, Smith Kline & French Laboratories, Philadelphia, Penn.

A new symptom rating scale, called the Physician's Rating List (PRL), designed to assess anxiety and total morbidity in psychoneurotics, was compared to global assessments in outpatients with anxiety reactions who were treated with trifluoperazine or a combination of trifluoperazine and amobarbital. Behavioral studies in animals had shown that the combined treatment had a wider range of activity than trifluoperazine alone. Whether the new rating scale and global ratings could distinguish this difference clinically led to this double-blind study by 17 physicians in more than 350 patients.

The results of this study showed that the new rating scale is more sensitive than the frequently used global ratings in measuring clinical response in psychoneurotic outpatients. It was sensitive enough to determine clinically the differences between trifluoperazine and a trifluoperazine-amobarbital combination and to show that the combination provided a significantly greater reduction of anxiety and total morbidity than trifluoperazine alone. With global ratings, differences between the two regimens were not statistically significant.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1969 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology