J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hochberg, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Reisinger, S. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hochberg, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Reisinger, S. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

REGULATORY SCIENCE

Systematic Investigation of Time Windows for Adverse Event Data Mining for Recently Approved Drugs

Alan M. Hochberg, Manfred Hauben, MD, MPH, Ronald K. Pearson, PhD, Donald J. O'Hara and Stephanie J. Reisinger

From ProSanos Corporation, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania (Mr Hochberg, Dr Pearson, Mr O'Hara, Ms Reisinger); Pfizer Corporation, New York (Dr Hauben); New York University School of Medicine, New York (Dr Hauben); New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York (Dr Hauben); and Brunel University, West London, UK (Dr Hauben).

The optimum timing of drug safety data mining for a new drug is uncertain. The objective of this study was to compare cumulative data mining versus mining with sliding time windows. Adverse Event Reporting System data (2001-2005) were studied for 27 drugs. A literature database was used to evaluate signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs) from an urn model data-mining algorithm. Data mining was applied cumulatively and with sliding time windows from 1 to 4 years in width. Time from SDR generation to the appearance of a publication describing the corresponding adverse event was calculated. Cumulative data mining and 1- to 2-year sliding windows produced the most SDRs for recently approved drugs. In the first postmarketing year, data mining produced SDRs an average of 800 days in advance of publications regarding the corresponding drug-event combination. However, this timing advantage reduced to zero by year 4. The optimum window width for sliding windows should increase with time on the market. Data mining may be most useful for early signal detection during the first 3 years of a drug's postmarketing life. Beyond that, it may be most useful for supporting or weakening hypotheses.


Key Words: Pharmacovigilancedata miningtime to signal

Address for reprints: Alan Hochberg, ProSanos Corporation, 225 Market St, Suite 502, Harrisburg, PA 17102; e-mail: alan.hochberg{at}prosanos.com.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology