J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hennig, S.
Right arrow Articles by Karlsson, M. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hennig, S.
Right arrow Articles by Karlsson, M. O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

QUANTITATIVE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

Trial Treatment Length Optimization With an Emphasis on Disease Progression Studies

Stefanie Hennig, PhD, Joakim Nyberg, MSc, Andrew C. Hooker, PhD and Mats O. Karlsson, PhD

From the Division of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Therapy, Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Optimal design has been used in the past mainly to optimize sampling schedules for clinical trials. Optimization on design variables other than sampling times has been published in the literature only once before. This study shows, as an example, optimization on the length of treatment periods to obtain reliable estimates of drug effects on longterm disease progression studies. Disease progression studies are high in cost, effort, and time; therefore, optimization of treatment length is highly recommended to avoid failure or loss of information. Results are provided for different drug effects (eg, protective and symptomatic) and for different lengths of studies and sampling schedules. The merits of extending the total study length versus inclusion of more samples per participants are investigated. The authors demonstrate that if no observations are taken during the washout period, a trial can lose up to 40% of its efficiency. Furthermore, when optimization of treatment length is performed using multiple possible drug effect models simultaneously, these studies show high power in discriminating between different drug effect models.


Key Words: optimal designdisease progression studiesclinical trial designpharmacometrics

Address for reprints: Stefanie Hennig, Division of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Therapy, Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Box 591, SE 751 24 Uppsala, Sweden; e-mail: stefanie.hennig{at}farmbio.uu.se.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology