J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Appendix
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0091270009341184v1
49/11/1284    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rohatagi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Khariton, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rohatagi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Khariton, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS

Is a Thorough QTc Study Necessary? The Role of Modeling and Simulation in Evaluating the QTc Prolongation Potential of Drugs

Shashank Rohatagi, PhD, Timothy J. Carrothers, ScD, Jon Kuwabara-Wagg, MD, PhD and Tatiana Khariton, PhD

From Daiichi Sankyo Pharma Development, Edison, New Jersey (Dr Rohatagi); Pharsight Corporation, Mountain View, California (Dr Carrothers, Dr Kuwabara-Wagg); and Forest Research Institute, Jersey City, New Jersey (Dr Khariton).

Concentration-QT (C-QT) modeling has been conducted for multiple compounds at various stages of development in different therapeutic areas. Data from available single and multiple ascending-dose (SAD/MAD) studies were pooled to construct population C-QT models, with post hoc predictions of concentration from a pharmacokinetic model. All SAD and MAD studies employed a customized robust QTc assessment with time-matched triplicate electrocardiograms and centralized manual QTc reading. Sources of variability were characterized, and the relationship between covariates and model parameters was explored, with a particular emphasis on correction for heart rate and diurnal variation. The results of population prediction of QTc prolongation were compared to available thorough QTc (TQT) study results, and the C-QT model was evaluated to determine whether it could establish the QTc prolongation relationship without the TQT results. Negative TQT study results confirmed negative simulation results from phase I/II C-QT models. Simulations were undertaken to characterize the ability of pooled C-QT modeling to obviate the need for a TQT. C-QT modeling should be implemented as a standard part of modeling and simulation at different phases of drug development and used in conjunction with other data that influence the need and/or the timing of a TQT study.


Key Words: population pharmacokineticsQT prolongationexposure-response

Address for reprints: Shashank Rohatagi, PhD, MBA, FCP, Daiichi Sankyo Pharma Development, 399 Thornall St, Edison, NJ 08837; e-mail: Srohatagi{at}dsus.com.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology