J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0091270008317305v1
48/6/671    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Penzak, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Davey, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Penzak, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Davey, R. T., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

DRUG INTERACTIONS

Limitations of Using a Single Postdose Midazolam Concentration to Predict CYP3A-Mediated Drug Interactions

Scott R. Penzak, PharmD, Kristin H. Busse, PharmD, Sarah M. Robertson, PharmD, Elizabeth Formentini, RNC, MSN, FNP-C, Raul M. Alfaro, MS and Richard T. Davey, Jr., MD

From the Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, Pharmacy Department (Dr Penzak, Dr Busse, Dr Robertson, Mr Alfaro) and Department of Critical Care Medicine (Ms Formentini), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (Dr Davey).

Midazolam is a common probe used to predict CYP3A activity, but multiple blood samples are necessary to determine midazolam's area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). As such, single sampling strategies have been examined. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of single midazolam concentrations to predict midazolam AUC in the presence and absence of CYP3A modulation by Ginkgo biloba extract (GBE). Subjects received oral midazolam 8 mg before and after 28 days of GBE administration. Postdose blood samples were collected during both study periods and midazolam AUC determined. Linear regression was used to generate measures of predictive performance for each midazolam concentration. The geometric mean ratio (90% confidence intervals) of midazolam AUC0-{infty} post-GBE/AUC0-{infty} pre-GBE was 0.66 (0.49-0.84) (P = .03). Before and after GBE administration, optimal midazolam sampling times were identified at 3.5 to 5 hours and 2 to 3 hours, respectively. Single midazolam concentrations between 2 and 5 hours correctly predicted the reduction in midazolam AUC following GBE exposure, but confidence intervals were generally wide. Intersubject variability in CYP3A activity (either inherent or from drug administration) alters the prediction of optimal midazolam sampling times; therefore, midazolam AUC is preferred for assessing CYP3A activity in drug-drug interaction studies.


Key Words: Midazolam • Ginkgo biloba extractdrug interactionsCYP3A

Address for reprints: Scott R. Penzak, PharmD, Clinical Pharmacokinetics Research Laboratory, National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center Pharmacy Department, Bldg 10, Room 1N 257, Bethesda, MD 20892; e-mail: spenzak{at}mail.cc.nih.gov.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology