J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Gobburu, J. V. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Gobburu, J. V. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

REGULATORY SCIENCE

Leveraging Prior Quantitative Knowledge to Guide Drug Development Decisions and Regulatory Science Recommendations: Impact of FDA Pharmacometrics During 2004-2006

Yaning Wang, A. Venkatesh Bhattaram, Pravin R. Jadhav, Lawrence J. Lesko, Rajanikanth Madabushi, J. Robert Powell, Wei Qiu, He Sun, Dong S. Yim, Jenny J. Zheng and Jogarao V. S. Gobburu

From Pharmacometrics, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.

The End-of-Phase 2A meetings are proposed to identify opportunities to make innovative medical products available sooner and to increase the quality of drug applications through early meetings between sponsors and the FDA. This article summarizes the overall experience across 11 pilot End-of-Phase 2A meetings since 2004. Four case studies are presented in more detail to demonstrate the various issues and methods encountered at these meetings. Overall, industry and FDA scientists ranked these meetings to be "very helpful" (average score of 4 on a scale of 1 to 5). In almost all the instances the sponsors changed their drug development plans subsequent to these extensive quantitative analyses-based meetings. A draft Guidance is being developed to be issued in 2008, and we hope this initiative will be resourced by then.


Key Words: Regulatory decisionsEOP2A meetingmodelingsimulationFDAdrug developmentpharmacokineticspharmacodynamicspharmacometrics

Address for correspondence: Yaning Wang, PhD, Team Leader, Pharmacometrics, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, CDER, FDA, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Building 21, Room 3662, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002; e-mail: yaning.wang{at}fda.hhs.gov.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
S. Laer, J. S. Barrett, and B. Meibohm
The In Silico Child: Using Simulation to Guide Pediatric Drug Development and Manage Pediatric Pharmacotherapy
J. Clin. Pharmacol., August 1, 2009; 49(8): 889 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology