|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS |
From St Paul's Cardiac Electrophysiology, London, England (Dr Malik, Dr Hnatkova) and Xention Ltd, Cambridge, England (Dr Ford, Dr Madge).
Detailed electrocardiographic (ECG) support was provided to a first-in-man, single-ascending-dose study that included 6 cohorts of 8 male volunteers each. In each cohort, 6 and 2 subjects received active compound and placebo, respectively. Long-term 12-lead ECGs were obtained on baseline day –1, dosing day 1, and day 2. Automatic QT-interval measurements were made at 63 time points (28 at baseline and 35 on treatment). Based on QT/RR distribution, 20% of measurements were visually verified. Baseline-corrected time-matched
QTc values were obtained at 35 postdose time points. Placebo subjects of all cohorts were pooled. When 2 cohorts of the lowest, middle, and highest doses were pooled (12 subjects per active treatment group), the spreads of placebo-corrected 
QTc values were within the regulatory requirements (single-sided 95% confidence interval <10 milliseconds) at all time points. Thus, this ECG support of the first-in-man study provided data of regulatory acceptable accuracy at a small fraction of the cost of a full thorough QT study.
Key Words: Electrocardiography QT interval first-in-man study
Address for reprints: Marek Malik, PhD, MD, St Paul's Cardiac Electrophysiology, London, England; e-mail: marek.malik{at}btinternet.com.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Krishna Model-Based Evaluation of QTc Interval Risk: An Increasing Emphasis on Early Decision Making J. Clin. Pharmacol., September 1, 2009; 49(9): 1010 - 1011. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |