J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McAleer, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sheikh, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McAleer, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sheikh, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PHARMACOKINETICS

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Ketorolac Following Single Intranasal and Intramuscular Administration in Healthy Volunteers

Sarah D. McAleer, PhD, BPharm, Oneeb Majid, MSc, Esther Venables, MIBiol, Torsten Polack, DrMed and Muhammed S. Sheikh, BSc (Hons)

From Medeval Limited, a Division of ICON plc, Skelton House, Manchester Science Park, Lloyd Street North, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Ketorolac was administered to 15 healthy volunteers in a phase 1, single-dose, crossover, randomized study. Subjects received open-label randomized 15- and 30-mg intramuscular (IM) ketorolac and blinded randomized 15- and 30- mg intranasal (IN) ketorolac. The IN ketorolac was well tolerated; the only nasal symptoms were some instances of mild irritation. The IN ketorolac was rapidly and well absorbed (median tmax, 0.50-0.75 hours), and the half-life was approximately 5 to 6 hours, values that were similar to those following IM administration. Relative bioavailability of IN compared to IM administration at the same doses was approximately 67% to 75%. Dose proportionality was noted between the 15- and 30-mg IN and IM dose levels. Thus, IN ketorolac offers a therapeutic alternative to IM administration and may provide benefits in the clinical setting.


Key Words: Ketorolacintranasalintramuscularpharmacokineticsvolunteers

Address for reprints: Oneeb Majid, ICON Development Solutions, Medeval Limited, Skelton House, Lloyd Street North, Manchester M15 6SH, UK.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. E. Moodie, C. R. Brown, E. J. Bisley, H. U. Weber, and L. Bynum
The Safety and Analgesic Efficacy of Intranasal Ketorolac in Patients with Postoperative Pain
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2008; 107(6): 2025 - 2031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology