J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gandia, P.
Right arrow Articles by Houin, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gandia, P.
Right arrow Articles by Houin, G.

PHARMACOKINETICS

Influence of Simulated Weightlessness on the Intramuscular and Oral Pharmacokinetics of Promethazine in 12 Human Volunteers

Peggy Gandia, PharmD, PhD, Sylvie Saivin, PharmD, PhD, Anne Pavy Le-Traon, MD, PhD, Antonio Guell, PhD and Georges Houin, PharmD, PhD

From Laboratoire de Pharmacocinétique et Toxicologie Clinique, Hôpital Purpan, Toulouse, France (Dr Gandia, Dr Saivin, Dr Houin); and Medes, Clinique Spatiale, Hôpital Rangueil-Larrey, Toulouse, France (Dr Pavy Le-Traon, Dr Guell).

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) recommends using promethazine to prevent and treat space motion sickness, but pharmacologic responses in space and on Earth are different. Twelve volunteers were given 50 mg promethazine orally or intramuscularly before and after 48 hours of bed rest to simulate weightlessness. The maximum measured plasma concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), and area under plasma concentration versus time curve from 0 to infinity (AUCinf) were determined, and the bioequivalence was tested between bed-rest and ambulatory status for the intramuscular and oral routes as well as between both routes for bed-rest and ambulatory position. Simulated weightlessness did not influence the ratio AUCbed rest/AUCambulatory after intramuscular injection, whereas a significant increase (26%) in the ratio was seen after oral administration, probably because of a prolonged contact time between promethazine and the intestinal wall associated with an increase in the intestinal transit time. The AUC was 3-fold higher when the drug was administered by the intramuscular route during both positions. Thus, intramuscular administration could be a good alternative to the oral route.


Key Words: Promethazinepharmacokineticsbed restweightlessness

Address for reprints: Georges Houin, PharmD, Phd, Laboratoire de Pharmacocinétique et Toxicologie Clinique, Institut Fédératif de Biologie, Hôpital PURPAN, 330 Avenue de Grande Bretagne TSA 70034, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France; e-mail: houin.g{at}chu-toulouse.fr.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology