J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cook, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cook, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

FORUM

So Many Studies, Too Few Subjects: Establishing Functional Relevance of Genetic Polymorphisms on Pharmacokinetics

J. Andrew Williams, PhD, Keith Johnson, PhD, Joseph Paulauskis, PhD and Jack Cook, PhD

From Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism (Dr Williams), Molecular Profiling (Dr Johnson), Worldwide Safety Sciences (Dr Paulauskis), Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics (Dr Cook), Pfizer Global Research and Development, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Based on current literature, greater clarity in defining the magnitude of polymorphism effects on pharmacokinetics can be achieved by addressing key components of study design, including adequate subject numbers per study group. Convincing evidence of functional relevance exists for polymorphisms in genes such as CYP2D6 and UGT1A1, whereas the published evidence for similar effects for CYP3A5, OATP1B1, and ABCB1 is still emerging or equivocal. Polymorphism-associated differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were simulated to incorporate (1) the ratio of group mean parameter values for homozygous wild-type subjects versus homozygous variants, (2) pharmacokinetic variability, and (3) sample size needed to achieve 80% power, assuming 69% coefficient of variation. Subject selection by genotype and choice of probe substrate are also considered. Simulation results and literature examples are incorporated to define key recommendations for future investigations. This will allow for more definitive statements in publications regarding genotype influence on pharmacokinetics.


Key Words: Polymorphismspharmacokineticspharmacogeneticsdrug dispositiondrug-metabolizing enzymesdrug transporters

Address for reprints: J. Andrew Williams, Pfizer Global Research and Development, Department of Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, 2800 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
G. L. Dickinson, S. Rezaee, N. J. Proctor, M. S. Lennard, G. T. Tucker, and A. Rostami-Hodjegan
Incorporating In Vitro Information on Drug Metabolism Into Clinical Trial Simulations to Assess the Effect of CYP2D6 Polymorphism on Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics: Dextromethorphan as a Model Application
J. Clin. Pharmacol., February 1, 2007; 47(2): 175 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology