|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS |
From Depomed Inc, Menlo Park, California (Dr Washington, Dr Hou, Dr Berner), Biovail Contract Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Dr Campanella and Dr Hughes) and the Clinical Microbiology Institute, Wilsonville, Oregon (Dr Brown).
Two open-label, randomized, 2-way crossover studies (1 single-dose and 1 steady-state) were conducted in healthy volunteers to compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a novel extended-release ciprofloxacin (ciprofloxacin ER; 500 mg once daily) and immediate-release ciprofloxacin (ciprofloxacin IR; 250 mg twice daily). For both studies, mean ciprofloxacin maximum concentration (Cmax) values after once-daily ciprofloxacin ER were significantly greater than those after the first daily dose of ciprofloxacin IR (P < .0001) but were lower than those after the second daily dose of ciprofloxacin IR (P < .05). The relative bioavailability of ciprofloxacin ER compared to ciprofloxacin IR was 93.8% in the single-dose study and 97.7% in the steady-state study. Mean urinary ciprofloxacin concentrations and excretion rates after either treatment were substantially greater than the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for susceptible uropathogens in both studies. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC, Cmax/MIC, amount excreted (Ae)/MIC, and Ae24/MIC ratios with ciprofloxacin ER were similar to or slightly greater than with ciprofloxacin IR for all susceptible organisms.
Key Words: Bioavailability urinary excretion minimum inhibitory concentrations
Address for reprints: Bret Berner, PhD, Depomed, Inc., 1360 O'Brien Drive, Menlo Park, CA 94025-1436.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Washington, E. Hou, N. Hughes, and B. Berner Effect of omeprazole on bioavailability of an oral extended-release formulation of ciprofloxacin Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., April 1, 2006; 63(7): 653 - 656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |