J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Averbuch, M.
Right arrow Articles by Katzper, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Averbuch, M.
Right arrow Articles by Katzper, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ANALGESIA

Assessment of Visual Analog versus Categorical Scale for Measurement of Osteoarthritis Pain

Mordechai Averbuch, MD and Meyer Katzper, PhD

From the Division of Analgesic, Anti-inflammatory, and Ophthalmic Drug Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Rockville, Maryland.

There is disagreement in the literature regarding which scales to use in pain measurement. The difference has usually been between nonverbal scales, such as visual analog scales and verbal ones, which usually provide only a limited number of response categories. A 12-week, randomized, double-blind naproxen sodium (500 mg bid) and placebo-controlled trial using the hip osteoarthritis (OA) flare-up pain mode, in which pain was measured on both visual analog and categorical scales simultaneously, was analyzed. The authors found a good correlation (> 0.995) between the time-series average of the unconstrained visual analog scale and a 5-point categorical scale pain measurement in the osteoarthritis pain model in both active and placebo treatment arms. However, for individuals, there is a wide range of VAS responses for each categorical score, with overlaps between categories. The visual analog and categorical scales appear as effective in determining average osteoarthritis pain. However, a combined metric scale for pain measurement that provides the subject with multiple cues may improve communication and concordance between scales for individual pain determination.


Key Words: Visual analogcategoricalscalepain

Address for reprints: Dr. Meyer Katzper, Division of Analgesic, Anti-inflammatory and Ophthalmic Drug Products, HFD-550, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fisher's Lane, Rockville, MD 20857.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
M. P. Couper, R. Tourangeau, F. G. Conrad, and E. Singer
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Visual Analog Scales: A Web Experiment
Social Science Computer Review, May 1, 2006; 24(2): 227 - 245.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology