J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bolla, S
Right arrow Articles by Jasti, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bolla, S
Right arrow Articles by Jasti, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Pharmacokinetics of diethylcarbamazine after single oral dose at two different times of day in human subjects

S Bolla, RR Boinpally, S Poondru, R Devaraj, and BR Jasti

In most Wuchereria bancrofti and Brugia malayi infections, the microfilaria are found in the blood in greatest number between 10 p.m. and 2 a.m., indicating that chronotherapy may be beneficial in treating such infections. This study reports the influence of time of administration on the pharmacokinetics of diethylcarbamazine (DEC) in healthy volunteers. The study was conducted in 12 healthy volunteers by administering a 150 mg single oral dose of diethylcarbamazine citrate at 0600 or 1800 h in a balanced crossover design with the approval of an institutional ethics committee. The subjects fasted for about 10 hours before and 3 hours after drug treatment. Blood samples were collected at predetermined time intervals, and the drug content in the serum was estimated using HPLC with an electrochemical detector. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using noncompartmental methods employing WinNonlin (version 3.1), and the means of various pharmacokinetic parameters were compared for any dosing time-related changes using a paired t-test at a probability level of 95%. The mean +/- SD values of pharmacokinetic parameters of DEC for the treatments at 0600 versus 1800 h were as follows: Cmax, 500+/-227 versus 637+/-401 ng/ml; tmax, 2.3+/-0.7 versus 2.7+/-1 h; Ka, 2.23+/-0.72 versus 1.96+/-0.97 h(-1); t1/2, 14.6+/-6.7 versus 11.4+/-4.9 h; AUC0-t, 5,334+/-1,853 versus 6,901+/-4,203 ng x h/ml; AUC0-infinity, 5,840+/-1,922 versus 7,220+/-4,205 ng x h/ml; CL/F, 36,058+/-19,011 versus 32,189+/-25,293 ml/h/kg; Vd/F, 570+/-225 versus 533+/-447 L; and MRT 17.7+/-5.9 versus 15.3+/-5.2 h. None of the parameters was significantly changed (p > 0.05) as a function of time of administration.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology