J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by St Peter, J.
Right arrow Articles by Swan, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by St Peter, J.
Right arrow Articles by Swan, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Pharmacokinetics of pilocarpine in subjects with varying degrees of renal function

JV St Peter, LJ Lambrecht, BW Gunderson, SA Andersen, SC Gallagher, and SK Swan

Data from three separate single-center studies were combined to assess the pharmacokinetics of orally administered pilocarpine. Pilocarpine concentration-time data were used to generate a data set including 42 subjects (34 males, 8 females) with varying degrees of renal function (average of two estimated creatinine clearance rates of 10 to 112 mL/min). Age ranged from 19 to 88 years. Subjects received single oral doses (range: 2.5-20 mg) of pilocarpine. Plasma samples were collected at time 0; at 20 and 40 minutes; and at 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours following dose administration. Cmax and AUC were normalized to a 5 mg exposure in those subjects who received doses other than 5 mg. Plasma pilocarpine concentrations were determined by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The pharmacokinetic parameters (elimination rate constant, Cmax, tmax, AUC, Vd/F, and Cl/F) in subjects with impaired renal function were similar to results found in other pharmacokinetic studies involving normal healthy volunteers with only Cmax being significantly higher (p < 0.05). No significant regression relationships were noted between creatinine clearance and pilocarpine elimination rate constant, tmax, Vd/F, Cl/F, or AUC. Pilocarpine clearance does not appear to be impaired in patients with varying degrees of renal insufficiency.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
T. Endo, M. Ban, K. Hirata, A. Yamamoto, Y. Hara, and Y. Momose
Involvement of CYP2A6 in the Formation of a Novel Metabolite, 3-Hydroxypilocarpine, from Pilocarpine in Human Liver Microsomes
Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2007; 35(3): 476 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology