Rosiglitazone has no clinically significant effect on nifedipine pharmacokinetics

To examine the effects of repeat oral dosing of rosiglitazone on the pharmacokinetics of nifedipine, a prototype CYP3A4 substrate, a randomized, open-label, crossover study was performed with two treatment phases separated by a washout period of at least 14 days. Twenty-eight healthy male volunteers received either a single 20 mg oral nifedipine dose or rosiglitazone 8 mg orally once daily for 14 days with a single 20 mg oral nifedipine dose administered on day 14. Plasma nifedipine concentrations were determined over the 24-hour period following administration of the nifedipine doses. Lack of effect was defined as the demonstration that the 90% CI was contained entirely within a symmetrical 30% range either side of unity on the loge-scale. Following rosiglitazone + nifedipine administration, the area under the nifedipine concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) was 13% lower than that after administration of nifedipine alone. This difference in nifedipine AUC(0-infinity) was not deemed to be clinically significant since the 90% CI was contained within the protocol-defined 30% range (point estimate for ratio of geometric means 0.87; 90% CI: 0.79, 0.96). Rosiglitazone had no marked effect on nifedipine peak plasma concentration (point estimate: 0.99; 90% CI: 0.73, 1.34) or time to peak concentration compared with nifedipine alone. Rosiglitazone coadministration produced a small decrease in the mean nifedipine half-life (point estimate: -0.77; 90% CI: mean difference -1.29 h, -0.25 h). Both treatment regimens were well tolerated and associated with a favorable safety profile. Rosiglitazone, at the highest dose used in clinical studies, produced a small, clinically insignificant decrease in nifedipine exposure. The very small effect on nifedipine pharmacokinetics suggests that rosiglitazone is an extremely weak inducer of CYP3A4, a characteristic that distinguishes rosiglitazone from troglitazone.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. L. Ripp, J. B. Mills, O. A. Fahmi, K. A. Trevena, J. L. Liras, T. S. Maurer, and S. M. de Morais Use of Immortalized Human Hepatocytes to Predict the Magnitude of Clinical Drug-Drug Interactions Caused by CYP3A4 Induction Drug Metab. Dispos., October 1, 2006; 34(10): 1742 - 1748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. V. Dimaraki and C. A. Jaffe Troglitazone Induces CYP3A4 Activity Leading to Falsely Abnormal Dexamethasone Suppression Test J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2003; 88(7): 3113 - 3116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Sahi, C. B. Black, G. A. Hamilton, X. Zheng, S. Jolley, K. A. Rose, D. Gilbert, E. L. LeCluyse, and M. W. Sinz Comparative Effects of Thiazolidinediones on in Vitro P450 Enzyme Induction and Inhibition Drug Metab. Dispos., April 1, 2003; 31(4): 439 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. E. Lebovitz, M. Kreider, and M. I. Freed Evaluation of Liver Function in Type 2 Diabetic Patients During Clinical Trials: Evidence that rosiglitazone does not cause hepatic dysfunction Diabetes Care, May 1, 2002; 25(5): 815 - 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]