J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alshowaier, I.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholls, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alshowaier, I.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholls, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Pharmacokinetics of S- and R-enantiomers of aminoglutethimide following oral administration of racemic drug in breast cancer patients

IA Alshowaier, A el-Yazigi, A Ezzat, A Abd el-Warith, and PJ Nicholls

This study was undertaken to examine the pharmacokinetics of both enantiomers of AG--that is, (R-AG) and (S-AG) and respective acetyl metabolites, R-AcAG and S-AcAG--in breast cancer patients. Six patients received a single dose (500 mg) of the racemic drug, and serial plasma samples and urine were collected over a 48-hour period. R-AG, S-AG, R-AcAG, and S-AcAg were measured simultaneously by high-performance liquid chromatography using two serial chiral separation columns with ultraviolet detection. The plasma concentrations of R-AG were about 1.5 times higher than those of S-AG, and the data for both enantiomers exhibited the characteristics of the one-compartment open model. There were no significant differences between R- and S-AG in ka, tmax, V/F, and t1/2. The formation of R- and S-AcAG was rapid, and no correlation was found between the t1/2 values of the AG enantiomers with that of their acetylated metabolites. Overall, 41% of the dose was excreted in urine as AG (15% R-AG and 26% S-AG) and 5.1% as AcAG (2.9% R-AcAG and 2.2% S-AcAG). Renal clearance of S-AG was significantly greater (i.e., 2.3-fold) than that of R-AG and appears to be most likely the cause for the other pharmacokinetic differences observed. Both enantiomers had low renal extraction ratios, suggesting extensive tubular reabsorption of the compounds. However, based on the data obtained, it was concluded that the main factor contributing to the therapeutic effectiveness of racemic AG is the large potency difference between the R- and S- forms (R > S). The pharmacokinetic differences between R-AG and S-AG appear to contribute only marginally to the activity of this drug as an aromatase inhibitor.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology