J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, D
Right arrow Articles by Wei, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhou, D
Right arrow Articles by Wei, S
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetic comparison of a sustained-release tablet and conventional tablets of naproxen in healthy volunteers

D Zhou, Q Zhang, W Lu, Q Xia, and S Wei

The pharmacokinetics of a new sustained-release tablet of naproxen (500 mg once daily) were compared with a conventional tablet (250 mg twice daily) after single- or multiple-dose oral administration in healthy volunteers using an open, randomized two-way crossover experimental design. Naproxen was well absorbed from the sustained-release tablet (approximately 97%) compared with the conventional tablet. Pharmacokinetic data showed that the sustained-release formulation reached significantly delayed mean peak plasma levels (Cmax) in both single- and multiple-dose studies and lower Cmax in a single-dose study than the conventional formulation. However, there were no statistically significant differences in other pharmacokinetic parameters, including area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), elimination half-life (t1/2), and elimination rate constant (Ke), in either single- or multiple-dose studies between the two treatments. In addition, there were no significant differences between formulations in Cmax, minimum plasma concentration (Cmin), and fluctuation index in the multiple-dose study.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology