J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Babul, N
Right arrow Articles by Moulin, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Babul, N
Right arrow Articles by Moulin, D
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Comparative efficacy and safety of controlled-release morphine suppositories and tablets in cancer pain

N Babul, L Provencher, F Laberge, Z Harsanyi, and D Moulin

Although the oral route is the preferred method of opioid therapy in patients with cancer pain, many patients will require an alternate route of analgesic administration at some point during the trajectory of their illness. This study compared the efficacy and safety of a novel, controlled-release suppository of morphine (MSC-R) and controlled-release morphine tablets (MSC-T) in patients with cancer pain. In a double-blind crossover study, 27 patients with cancer pain were randomized to receive MSC-R or MSC-T every 12 hours for 7 days each, using a 1:1 analgesic equivalence ratio. Pain intensity was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Present Pain Intensity Index of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Nausea and sedation were also assessed with a VAS. Pharmacodynamic assessments were made by the patient at 8:00 AM, 12:00 PM, 4:00 PM, and 8:00 PM and rescue morphine use recorded in a daily diary. There were no significant differences between MSC-R and MSC-T in overall scores for pain intensity VAS, ordinal pain intensity, and sedation. There was a small but significant difference in overall nausea VAS score in favor of MSC-R. Mean daily rescue analgesic use did not differ significantly during between treatment with MSC-R and MSC-T. MSC-R provides pain control comparable to that provided by MSC-T when given every 12 hours at a 1:1 dose ratio, and represents a reliable alternative method of pain control for patients unable to take oral opioid agents.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. Puana, R. K. McAllister, F. A. Hunter, J. Warden, and E. W. Childs
Morphine Attenuates Microvascular Hyperpermeability via a Protein Kinase A-Dependent Pathway
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2008; 106(2): 480 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. Charleston, R. Puana, R. K. McAllister, F. A. Hunter, and E. W. Childs
Morphine sulfate attenuates hemorrhagic shock- induced hyperpermeability.
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2006; 103(1): 156 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
P Leman, Y Kapadia, and J Herington
Randomised controlled trial of the onset of analgesic efficacy of dexketoprofen and diclofenac in lower limb injury
Emerg. Med. J., November 1, 2003; 20(6): 511 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
N. Cherny, C. Ripamonti, J. Pereira, C. Davis, M. Fallon, H. McQuay, S. Mercadante, G. Pasternak, and V. Ventafridda
Strategies to Manage the Adverse Effects of Oral Morphine: An Evidence-Based Report
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2001; 19(9): 2542 - 2554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
W. L. Greene, J. Concato, and A. R. Feinstein
Claims of Equivalence in Medical Research: Are They Supported by the Evidence?
Ann Intern Med, May 2, 2000; 132(9): 715 - 722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology