J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hwang, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hwang, S
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of OROS and immediate-release amitriptyline hydrochloride formulations

SK Gupta, J Shah, D Guinta, and S Hwang

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of amitriptyline hydrochloride after oral administration of an OROS osmotic system, which provides controlled drug delivery, and an immediate-release (IR) tablet, were evaluated in 24 healthy volunteers after repeated administration for 14 days. Each morning, subjects received either 75 mg of the OROS (amitriptyline HCl) controlled-release formulation or the 75 mg IR amitriptyline tablet for 14 days on two separate occasions with a washout period of 21 days according to a randomly assigned sequence. Serial blood samples were collected for a period of 58 hours after the day 14 dose, then these samples were analyzed by the gas chromatography method for amitriptyline and nortriptyline. Subjective ratings of dry mouth and drowsiness were collected at specific times throughout each treatment period. Administration of the OROS formulation resulted in much more consistent plasma concentrations of the drug and metabolite compared with the IR formulation at steady state. The mean maximum concentration (Cmax) of amitriptyline was significantly lower after administration of OROS than the IR formulation. Mean values for area under the concentration--time curve (AUC0-24) for the OROS and IR formulations were 1,265 and 1,393 ng. hr/mL, respectively. The drug-to-metabolite ratio was found to be similar for both treatments, suggesting that there was no difference in metabolism between treatments. Incidence and severity of the anticholinergic effects were similar for the two treatments. A clockwise hysteresis between baseline-corrected drowsiness and drug concentration suggests development of tolerance of the anticholinergic effects after both treatments. Using a hypothetical anatagonist metabolite model to explain tolerance development, the shape of the hysteresis curves of the two treatments could be explained by differences in dosing frequency.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology