J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Jorkasky, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Jorkasky, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Bioequivalence assessment of a single 5 mg/day testosterone transdermal system versus two 2.5 mg/day systems in hypogonadal men

DE Wilson, AW Meikle, SC Boike, AJ Fairless, RC Etheredge, and DK Jorkasky

A novel, nonscrotal, transdermal delivery system for testosterone therapy has been marketed for treatment of hypogonadal men. The usual dose of this system is two 2.5 mg/day systems applied daily. A new system has been developed that administers a dose of 5 mg/day using a single patch rather than two patches. A randomized, steady-state, four-period, replicate-design, open-label, crossover study was conducted to assess the bioequivalence of the two testosterone transdermal delivery systems in postpubertal, hypogonadal men: two 2.5 mg/day patches as the reference regimen (R) and one 5 mg/day patch as the test regimen (T). 21 men were enrolled, and 20 completed the study. Each subject was randomly assigned to one of four sequences (R1-R2-T1-T2, T1-T2-R1-R2, R1-T1-T2-R2, T1-R1-R2-T2), such that each subject received each regimen during two study sessions. Two subjects were inadvertently treated according to the sequence T1-R1-T2-R2. Patches were applied to the upper arm, thigh, and back in the evening on days 1, 2, and 3, respectively, of each study session. Serial blood samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic analysis of testosterone for 24 hours after patch application on day 3 of each study session. The two formulations would be considered bioequivalent if the 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratios of the adjusted geometric means for T:R for both area under the concentration--time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24) and maximum concentration (Cmax) were completely contained in the interval (0.80, 1.25). Mean values for AUC0-24 and Cmax were similar for the two formulations. The T and R formulations were found to be bioequivalent based on both AUC0-24 (90% CI 0.96, 1.08) and Cmax (90% CI 0.92, 1.07). The median time to Cmax was also similar, indicating comparable rates of testosterone absorption for both formulations. Based on this analysis, the testosterone transdermal system 5 mg/day patch is bioequivalent to two of the 2.5 mg/day patches. Both systems were safe and well tolerated in hypogonadal men.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. Y. Liu, R. S. Swerdloff, B. D. Anawalt, R. A. Anderson, W. J. Bremner, J. Elliesen, Y.-Q. Gu, W. M. Kersemaekers, Robert. I. McLachlan, M. C. Meriggiola, et al.
Determinants of the Rate and Extent of Spermatogenic Suppression during Hormonal Male Contraception: An Integrated Analysis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2008; 93(5): 1774 - 1783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
M. Wald, R. B. Meacham, L. S. Ross, and C. S. Niederberger
Testosterone Replacement Therapy for Older Men
J Androl, March 1, 2006; 27(2): 126 - 132.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. S. Swerdloff, C. Wang, G. Cunningham, A. Dobs, A. Iranmanesh, A. M. Matsumoto, P. J. Snyder, T. Weber, J. Longstreth, and N. Berman
Long-Term Pharmacokinetics of Transdermal Testosterone Gel in Hypogonadal Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2000; 85(12): 4500 - 4510.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Wang, R. S. Swerdloff, A. Iranmanesh, A. Dobs, P. J. Snyder, G. Cunningham, A. M. Matsumoto, T. Weber, and N. Berman the Testosterone Gel Study Group
Transdermal Testosterone Gel Improves Sexual Function, Mood, Muscle Strength, and Body Composition Parameters in Hypogonadal Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2000; 85(8): 2839 - 2853.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology