J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Naranjo, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ozdemir, V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Naranjo, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ozdemir, V
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Development and evaluation of a clinical psychopharmacology educational curriculum

CA Naranjo, RW Shulman, and V Ozdemir

Clinical psychopharmacology training at the University of Toronto (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) was in need of improvement. The authors developed and evaluated a Clinical Psychopharmacology Educational Curriculum to complement the education provided to trainees and staff. The program consisted of journal clubs, case rounds, and didactic research tutorials and lectures. The program was attended by staff, fellows, psychiatry residents, graduate pharmacology students, medical students, and pharmacists. No course credit or continuing medical education credits were offered for participating in the program. The program ran for two academic years (September 1994-June 1996). Anonymous evaluation forms were collected after the sessions. These evaluated content, presentation style, and educational value, each on a scale from 1 (unsatisfactory) to 5 (excellent). Ratings for each component of the curriculum were close to excellent. The case rounds were rated slightly better for presentation style and educational value. Positive ratings suggest that similar efforts, particularly using case-based methods, should be developed in other teaching hospitals contingent on availability of qualified faculty and funding.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Acad. PsychiatryHome page
I. D. Glick, C. Salzman, B. M. Cohen, D. F. Klein, C. Moutier, H. A. Nasrallah, D. Ongur, P. Wang, and S. Zisook
Improving the Pedagogy Associated With the Teaching of Psychopharmacology
Acad Psychiatry, June 1, 2007; 31(3): 211 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Acad. PsychiatryHome page
R. Balon
Teaching Psychopharmacology Introduction
Acad Psychiatry, June 1, 2005; 29(2): 116 - 119.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Acad. PsychiatryHome page
S. Zisook, S. Benjamin, R. Balon, I. Glick, A. Louie, C. Moutier, T. Moyer, C. Santos, and M. Servis
Alternate Methods of Teaching Psychopharmacology
Acad Psychiatry, June 1, 2005; 29(2): 141 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Acad. PsychiatryHome page
S. L. Dubovsky
Who Is Teaching Psychopharmacology? Who Should Be Teaching Psychopharmacology?
Acad Psychiatry, June 1, 2005; 29(2): 155 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Acad. PsychiatryHome page
A. M. Georgiopoulos and J. C. Huffman
Teaching Psychopharmacology: Two Trainees' Perspectives
Acad Psychiatry, June 1, 2005; 29(2): 167 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology