J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groen, H
Right arrow Articles by Jonkman, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Groen, H
Right arrow Articles by Jonkman, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

No pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction between theophylline and the leukotriene biosynthesis inhibitor BAY x 1005

H Groen, HL Moesker, OR Leeuwenkamp, FA Sollie, and JH Jonkman

An open, randomized, three-period crossover study was conducted to compare the steady-state pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of concomitant administration of BAY x 1005 and theophylline in 12 healthy volunteers. BAY x 1005 (250 mg twice daily; treatment A) and theophylline (400 mg twice daily; treatment B), were administered alone and concomitantly (treatment C) for 6 days with a final morning dose on day 7. The treatments were separated by washout periods of at least 5 days. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived from concentrations of BAY x 1005 and theophylline as measured by high-performance liquid chromatography in plasma collected before the morning dose on days 5 and 6 and at various times on day 7 of each period until 24 hours after drug administration. Adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiograms, and clinical laboratory studies were monitored as safety parameters. Levels of leukotriene B4 (LTB4) were assessed in plasma collected on days 1 and 7. The treatments were well tolerated by all participants. The ratios of maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve for one 12-hour dosing interval (AUC tau) for treatment C versus B for theophylline on day 7 was 98% for both parameters. For BAY x 1005, the ratios of treatment C versus treatment A were 94% for Cmax and 101% for AUC tau. Plasma LTB4 remained virtually unchanged during either treatment. Steady-state concentrations of theophylline were not affected by concomitant BAY x 1005 intake, and addition of theophylline had no clinically relevant effect on steady-state plasma concentrations of BAY x 1005. The combination of theophylline and BAY x 1005 did not lead to a change in nature, intensity, or frequency of adverse events.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. DRAZEN
Clinical Pharmacology of Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists and 5-Lipoxygenase Inhibitors
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 1997; 157(6): 233S - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology