J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, B.
Right arrow Articles by Forgue, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, B.
Right arrow Articles by Forgue, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparisons of twice daily and four times daily formulations of procainamide in patients with frequent ventricular premature depolarization

BB Yang, RB Abel, AC Uprichard, JA Smithers, and ST Forgue

A study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of procainamide and its active metabolite, N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA), as a function of dose and formulation and to characterize the relationship between ventricular premature depolarization (VPD) rate and plasma concentrations of procainamide and NAPA. A subset of patients (n = 43) with frequent VPD who were enrolled in a double-blind, multicenter, activity trial were assigned in randomized fashion to receive 1 of 4 dose levels (placebo or 1,000, 2,000, or 4,000 mg/day procainamide) and to receive Procanbid (Parke-Davis) tablets every 12 hours or Procan SR (Parke-Davis) tablets every 6 hours during the first week of a blinded crossover phase. Patients crossed over to the alternative formulation after one week. Maximum and steady-state average concentrations of procainamide and NAPA after administration of Procanbid tablets were equivalent to those after administration of an equivalent daily dose of Procan SR tablets. Corresponding trough concentrations of procainamide were lower after administration of Procanbid tablets than after administration of Procan SR tablets. Both formulations produced disproportionate increases in procainamide concentrations with increasing dose; concentrations of NAPA increased in proportion to dose. Assessment of the relationship between VPD rate and drug concentration in plasma indicated no substantive difference between the two formulations. It was concluded that administration of Procanbid tablets every 12 hours is essentially equivalent to administration of procainamide extended-release tablets (Procan SR) every 6 hours with respect to pharmacokinetics of procainamide and NAPA and to VPD suppression.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology