|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
Articles |
In this study of the relationship between dose and plasma concentration of verapamil, controlled-release verapamil in doses of 120 mg, 180 mg, 360 mg, and 540 mg were examined. The 48 study subjects received verapamil daily during each of the 4 sequential 5-day dosing segments. Blood samples were collected frequently to obtain first-dose and steady-state (fifth dose) concentration profiles of verapamil. Plasma concentrations of R- and S-verapamil and R- and S-norverapamil were measured by stereospecific assay. Statistical comparisons of pharmacokinetic parameters and mean differences between doses were performed with analysis of variance models. At steady state, area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values for R- and S-verapamil at both the 120-mg and 180-mg doses were about 1.5 times higher than the corresponding first-dose values. After both first and fifth doses, pharmacokinetic parameters for all four analytes were dose proportional between the 120-mg and 180-mg doses. A dose-proportional relationship also was found between the 360-mg and 540-mg dose levels. However, nonlinearity was found between the 180-mg dose and higher doses, suggesting saturable metabolic pathways. The dose-proportional relationship between the 360-mg and 540-mg doses suggests that other first-order metabolic pathways become dominant. Although results from this study are partially consistent with previously reported nonlinear verapamil kinetics, this is the first clinical study to demonstrate a dose-proportional relationship for verapamil at both low and high input rates (mg/hr). In addition, first-order disposition pathways of verapamil are probably nonexistent at medium input rates and become dominant at higher input rates.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. S. Cohen, M. S. Matharu, and P. J. Goadsby Electrocardiographic abnormalities in patients with cluster headache on verapamil therapy Neurology, August 14, 2007; 69(7): 668 - 675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |