J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fujimura, A
Right arrow Articles by Kotegawa, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fujimura, A
Right arrow Articles by Kotegawa, T
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of oral (Catapres) and transdermal (M-5041T) clonidine in healthy subjects

A Fujimura, A Ebihara, K Ohashi, T Shiga, Y Kumagai, H Nakashima, and T Kotegawa

The pharmacokinetic as well as pharmacodynamic properties of a transdermal clonidine, M-5041T (M) and its safety were compared with those of oral clonidine, Catapres (Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Hyogo, Japan). One patch of M containing 6 mg of clonidine was applied on the right chest for 3 days or one tablet of Catapres (.075 mg) was given orally every 12 hours for 3 days in eight healthy subjects. The study was conducted by a crossover design with 14 to 16 days' interval between the cross-over. Blood and urine samples for clonidine concentration were obtained, and blood pressure (BP) was measured for a 168-hour period after application of M and for a 96-hour period after initiation of Catapres therapy. Plasma concentration of clonidine increased gradually after application of M and decreased gradually after removal, whereas this parameter increased rapidly during the absorption phase and decreased rapidly in the elimination phase after each dosage of Catapres. Elimination half-life of clonidine after removal of M was significantly greater than that after the final dosage of Catapres. No significant difference was observed in maximum plasma concentration or area under the plasma concentration-time curve between the two trials. The BP lowering effects of M and Catapres did not differ significantly. Adverse symptoms occurred more frequently during Catapres therapy than during treatment with M. Most of these symptoms were observed when plasma clonidine concentration was relatively higher in each trial. These results suggest that M is effective for the treatment of hypertension with a lower incidence of adverse symptoms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
M. L. Buchanan, T. R. Easterling, D. B. Carr, D. D. Shen, L. J. Risler, W. L. Nelson, D. R. Mattison, and M. F. Hebert
Clonidine Pharmacokinetics in Pregnancy
Drug Metab. Dispos., April 1, 2009; 37(4): 702 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Inomata, S.-i. Kihara, M. Miyabe, K. Sumiya, Y. Baba, Y. Kohda, and H. Toyooka
The Hypnotic and Analgesic Effects of Oral Clonidine During Sevoflurane Anesthesia in Children: A Dose-Response Study
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2002; 94(6): 1479 - 1483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Kihara, S. Inomata, Y. Yaguchi, H. Toyooka, Y. Baba, and Y. Kohda
The Awakening Concentration of Sevoflurane in Children
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2000; 91(2): 305 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology