J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pai, S.
Right arrow Articles by et, al.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pai, S.
Right arrow Articles by et, al.

Articles

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of didanosine (2',3'-dideoxyinosine) plasma concentrations obtained in phase I clinical trials in patients with AIDS or AIDS-related complex

SM Pai, UA Shukla, TH Grasela, CA Knupp, R Dolin, FT Valentine, C McLaren, HA Liebman, RR Martin, KA Pittman, and al. et

Plasma didanosine concentration data from 36 patients receiving once-a-day therapy and from 33 patients receiving twice-a-day therapy were subject to population pharmacokinetic analysis with the computer program NONMEM. Once- or twice-a-day regimens of didanosine were administered intravenously (i.v.) (dose: 0.8-33 mg/kg) during the first 2 weeks of therapy, and orally (dose: 1.6-66 mg/kg) for the remaining 4 weeks of therapy. Plasma pharmacokinetics were determined after the first and last (steady-state) i.v. and oral doses. Population pharmacokinetic parameters for the combined i.v. and oral steady-state data were (mean [%CV]): systemic clearance, CL, 0.70 (5.2) L/h/kg; central compartment volume, Vc, 0.18 (32) L/kg; steady-state distribution volume, Vdss, 0.84 (6.8) L/kg; first-order absorption rate constant, Ka, 1.3 (9.5) hr-1; and bioavailable fraction, F, 0.34 (8.5). Interindividual variability (omega) was (%CV) 22.3 and 71.0 for CL and Vc, respectively. Intraindividual (residual) variability (sigma) in plasma concentrations (%CV) was 50.2. Body weight, sex, and age did not account for the variability in either CL or Vc, and the use of alternate pharmacokinetic models did not reduce the value of intraindividual variability. Population parameters for the combined i.v. and oral first-dose data were generally similar to those for the steady-state data. The parameters can be used to design dosing regimens in patients using the Bayesian feedback approach.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
E. I Ette and P. J Williams
Population Pharmacokinetics II: Estimation Methods
Ann. Pharmacother., November 1, 2004; 38(11): 1907 - 1915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
K. H. P. Moore, G. J. Yuen, E. K. Hussey, G. E. Pakes, J. J. Eron Jr., and J. A. Bartlett
Population Pharmacokinetics of Lamivudine in Adult Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients Enrolled in Two Phase III Clinical Trials
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 1999; 43(12): 3025 - 3029.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
X.-J. Zhou, L. B. Sheiner, R. T. D'Aquila, M. D. Hughes, M. S. Hirsch, M. A. Fischl, V. A. Johnson, M. Myers, J.-P. Sommadossi, and The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious D
Population Pharmacokinetics of Nevirapine, Zidovudine, and Didanosine in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 1999; 43(1): 121 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. M. Adams, M. J. Shelton, R. G. Hewitt, T. H. Grasela, M. DeRemer, and G. D. Morse
Relationship between Didanosine Exposure and Surrogate Marker Response in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Outpatients
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 1998; 42(4): 821 - 826.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology