J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strom, C
Right arrow Articles by Larsson, O
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strom, C
Right arrow Articles by Larsson, O
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Analgesic efficacy of acetaminophen sustained release

C Strom, O Forsberg, H Quiding, S Engevall, and O Larsson

The analgesic efficacy of acetaminophen sustained release (SR) and acetaminophen immediate plus sustained release (IR + SR) was evaluated in 200 outpatients with pain after oral surgery. Under double-blind conditions SR high dose (2000 mg) or low dose (1000 mg), IR + SR high dose (500 + 1500 mg) or low dose (250 + 750 mg), or acetaminophen standard tablet high dose (1000 mg) or low dose (500 mg) were randomly administered after removal of a lower third molar. The hourly pain intensity was rated on a visual analog scale during 12 hours. The efficacy was based on peak effect (maximum pain intensity difference in percent), pain reduction (mean percentage pain intensity difference), duration of effect (time to remedication) and pain reduction index (pain reduction multiplied by duration of effect). Pain reduction was 37% with the 500-mg tablet and 54% with SR 2000 mg. The peak effect increased from 53% after 1.9 hours for the 500-mg tablet to 67% after 2.6 hours for SR 2000 mg. The SR formulation significantly increased the duration of effect without reduction in peak effect.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
QJMHome page
C.L. SHEEN, J.F. DILLON, D.N. BATEMAN, K.J. SIMPSON, and T.M. MACDONALD
Paracetamol toxicity: epidemiology, prevention and costs to the health-care system
QJM, September 1, 2002; 95(9): 609 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology