J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abrahamsson, B
Right arrow Articles by Bergstrand, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abrahamsson, B
Right arrow Articles by Bergstrand, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1990; 30:S46-S54
© 1990 the American College of Clinical Pharmacology


Articles

The relationship between metoprolol plasma concentration and beta 1-blockade in healthy subjects: a study on conventional metoprolol and metoprolol CR/ZOK formulations

B Abrahamsson, P Lucker, B Olofsson, CG Regardh, A Sandberg, I Wieselgren, and R Bergstrand

Four studies using different daily doses (100 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg and 400 mg) have examined the bioequivalence of the once daily formulation metoprolol CR/ZOK and conventional metoprolol tablets (CT). These studies showed metoprolol CR/ZOK to have a similar beta 1-blocking activity to metoprolol CT but that the bioavailability of the new formulation was lower. This paper presents the analysis of data from all four studies, looking at the relationship between plasma concentrations and beta 1-blockade measured as reduction of exercise induced tachycardia. The log linear pharmacodynamic model was used for each of the four doses to compare the two formulations. Mean slopes and intercepts in the linear regression analysis of log plasma concentration of metoprolol versus beta 1-blockade did not differ significantly between CR/ZOK and CT in any of the four studies. After having shown lack of influence of the absorption rate of the plasma concentration-effect relationship, data for CR/ZOK and CT formulations from the 200 mg study were pooled for each individual subject and fitted to an Emax model. The maximal beta 1-blocking effect (Emax) was 28% (95% confidence interval: 25-31%) and the plasma concentration for obtaining 50% of Emax (C50) was 105 nmol/L (95% confidence interval: 74-135 nmol/L). The plasma concentration-effect data from the 100 mg, 300 mg and 400 mg studies were reasonably well within the 95% prediction interval based on the 200 mg study, which showed the validity of the obtained relationship.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
H. J Tangeman and J H. Patterson
Extended-Release Metoprolol Succinate in Chronic Heart Failure
Ann. Pharmacother., May 1, 2003; 37(5): 701 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. A. Groenning, J. C. Nilsson, L. Sondergaard, T. Fritz-Hansen, H. B. W. Larsson, and P. R. Hildebrandt
Antiremodeling effects on the left ventricle during beta-blockade with metoprolol in the treatment of chronic heart failure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2000; 36(7): 2072 - 2080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
L. Brynne, M. O. Karlsson, and L. K. Paalzow
Concentration-Effect Relationship of l-Propranolol and Metoprolol in Spontaneous Hypertensive Rats after Exercise-Induced Tachycardia
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 1998; 286(3): 1152 - 1158.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology