J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lucker, P
Right arrow Articles by Bergstrand, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lucker, P
Right arrow Articles by Bergstrand, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1990; 30:S17-S27
© 1990 the American College of Clinical Pharmacology


Articles

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of metoprolol CR/ZOK once daily with conventional tablets once daily and in divided doses

P Lucker, G Moore, I Wieselgren, B Olofsson, and R Bergstrand

Four studies of identical design, each on 18 young healthy subjects, were undertaken to study the pharmacokinetics and beta 1-receptor blockade at steady state after a once daily dose (od) of 100, 200, 300 and 400 mg of metoprolol CR/ZOK (a new controlled release preparation) in comparison with 100 mg dosages (od, bid, tid and qid, respectively) of conventional metoprolol tablets (CT). All studies were of randomized three-way crossover design with 7-day double-blind treatment periods separated by 7-day single-blind washout periods. A number of predose plasma concentrations and assessments of beta 1-blockade were made during the study and a full pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study was performed on day 7. The maximal plasma concentration, Cmax, was significantly lower after metoprolol CR/ZOK compared to CT after all doses--the most pronounced difference being observed after the 100 mg dose when both preparations were given once daily (145 nmol/L vs 606 nmol/L) and the least difference after the 400 mg dose when metoprolol CT was given every 6 hours (837 nmol/L vs 1111 nmol/L). The maximal plasma concentration occurred later after metoprolol CR/ZOK than CT in all studies (median 2.5-4.1 hours vs 1.0-1.2 hours). The trough plasma concentration, Cmin, was significantly higher after 100 mg metoprolol CR/ZOK compared to CT dosed once daily; CminS were comparable between the two preparations in the 200 mg and 300 mg studies and lower after metoprolol CR/ZOK in the 400 mg study (278 nmol/L vs 469 nmol/L). In all four studies the AUCs were significantly lower after metoprolol CR/ZOK compared to CT with the mean relative bioavailability being approximately similar (73-84%). All metoprolol treatments produced a statistically significant beta 1-blockade (measured as percent reduction of exercise induced tachycardia) throughout the whole day compared to placebo except in the 100 mg study where the effect of once daily CT did not differ from placebo during the last 6 hours. Consequently, a significantly higher beta 1-blockade was observed after metoprolol CR/ZOK compared to CT in this latter period. The maximum beta 1-blockade (Emax) after CR/ZOK 100 mg was significantly lower than after CT 100 mg once daily (12.6% vs 23.3%) but when CT was given in divided doses from 200 to 400 mg daily, Emax did not differ between the two formulations. Once daily administration of 100 mg of both products resulted in a significantly higher beta 1-blockade 24 hours after dosing with CR/ZOK compared to CT, but when CT was taken in divided doses this difference between the treatments was less pronounced.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Heart Fail SupplHome page
H.J. Dargie
Current controversies in drug use
Eur J Heart Fail Suppl, April 1, 2009; 8(suppl_1): i15 - i20.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
J. L. Bauman and R. L. Talbert
Pharmacodynamics of{beta}-Blockers in Heart Failure: Lessons from the Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, April 1, 2004; 9(2): 117 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
H. J Tangeman and J H. Patterson
Extended-Release Metoprolol Succinate in Chronic Heart Failure
Ann. Pharmacother., May 1, 2003; 37(5): 701 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology