J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diebschlag, W
Right arrow Articles by Bullingham, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diebschlag, W
Right arrow Articles by Bullingham, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

A double-blind study of the efficacy of topical ketorolac tromethamine gel in the treatment of ankle sprain, in comparison to placebo and etofenamate

W Diebschlag, W Nocker, and R Bullingham

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study the efficacy and safety of topical ketorolac tromethamine were assessed in the reduction of inflammation and pain due to ankle sprain. Ketorolac 2% gel was compared with etofenamate and placebo (ketorolac vehicle) in a 15-day study. Patients attended for visits on days 1 (admission), 2, 3, 4, 8, and 15 of the study. Measurements of efficacy were ankle volume, pain measured on visual analogue scales (VAS) and verbal rating of pain. Safety was assessed by volunteered adverse events and vital signs. A total of 37 patients was admitted to the study of whom 13 received ketorolac, 12 placebo, and 12 etofenamate. One patient receiving ketorolac was lost to follow-up on day 15 owing to an unrelated accident. The remaining 36 patients completed the study. Ketorolac was significantly better than placebo in reducing the volume of the injured ankle based on the maximum, the area under the curve, and the day 15 percentage changes in ankle volume. Results for etofenamate were similar to those for ketorolac for all three variables and there were no significant differences between the active treatments. Reductions in VAS pain at rest were more marked in the ketorolac group than either of the other groups at all visits. On day 4 the differences between ketorolac and each of the other groups were statistically significant. Reductions in VAS pain on movement were also greatest for the ketorolac group at all visits. The differences between ketorolac and each of the other groups achieved statistical significance on days 4 and 8, but were marginal in terms of significance on day 2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
R. A. Dionne, D. Haynes, J. S. Brahim, J. S. Rowan, and P.-H. Guivarc'h
Analgesic Effect of Sustained-Release Flurbiprofen Administered at the Site of Tissue Injury in the Oral Surgery Model
J. Clin. Pharmacol., December 1, 2004; 44(12): 1418 - 1424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. Lin, W. Zhang, A. Jones, and M. Doherty
Efficacy of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of osteoarthritis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
BMJ, August 7, 2004; 329(7461): 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
R. E. Davis, J. I. Cohen, J. E. Robinson, S. L. Urben, and T. A. Cook
Ketorolac (Toradol) and Acute Random-Pattern Skin Flap Survival in Rat
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, June 1, 1995; 121(6): 673 - 677.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology