J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forland, S.
Right arrow Articles by Cutler, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forland, S.
Right arrow Articles by Cutler, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Apparent reduced absorption of gemfibrozil when given with colestipol

SC Forland, Y Feng, and RE Cutler

Colestipol and gemfibrozil may be used in combination to lower serum cholesterol and triglycerides. Since colestipol is known to bind certain anionic drugs, we studied the effect of colestipol on the pharmacokinetics of gemfibrozil in 10 patients with elevated serum cholesterol and triglycerides. Each patient received 600 mg of gemfibrozil by mouth during four different studies. Gemfibrozil was given randomly either alone, with, 2 hours before, or 2 hours after 5 grams of colestipol. The serum gemfibrozil concentration time curves were similar when gemfibrozil was given alone or two hours before or after colestipol. There was also no statistical difference in peak gemfibrozil concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), area under the curve (AUC), or serum elimination half-life (t1/2) between any of these three treatments. However, when colestipol was given with gemfibrozil, there was a decrease in AUC (43.6 +/- 21.9 mg*hr/L) compared with gemfibrozil given alone (62.6 +/- 10.3 mg*hr/L) which was statistically different by both ANOVA and paired t-test. This finding suggests a decrease in gemfibrozil bioavailability. Cmax when colestipol was given with gemfibrozil (14.7 +/- 6.6 mg/L) was not statistically different from gemfibrozil alone (20.1 +/- 4.9 mg/L). However, the mean serum concentrations when gemfibrozil was given with colestipol were significantly lower at the 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 hour sampling times when compared to the other regimens. Gemfibrozil serum elimination half-life was not significantly altered by combination with colestipol. The data suggest a reduction of gemfibrozil bioavailability when colestipol is administered concomitantly. Separating the administration of these two drugs by at least two hours will avoid this drug interaction.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
R. S. Rosenson
Low Levels of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Hypoalphalipoproteinemia) An Approach to Management
Arch Intern Med, July 12, 1993; 153(13): 1528 - 1538.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology