J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gutfeld, M.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gutfeld, M.
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

The influence of intravenous cimetidine dosage regimens on the disposition of theophylline

MB Gutfeld, LS Welage, CA Walawander, JH Wilton, and NJ Harrison

The influence of the method of cimetidine administration on theophylline disposition was studied in nine healthy, cigarette smoking male volunteers. The treatment phases consisted of: A) theophylline alone, B) theophylline plus intermittent cimetidine therapy (300 mg IV every 6 hr), and C) theophylline in combination with continuous infusion cimetidine (50 mg/hr). Theophylline (4.8 mg/kg) was administered intravenously as aminophylline over 30 minutes during each treatment phase. During study phases B and C subjects received 48 hours of cimetidine therapy beginning 24 hours prior to theophylline dosing. Blood samples for determination of theophylline concentrations were collected serially over 24 hours. Serum theophylline concentrations were determined in duplicate using fluorescence polarization immunoassay (Abbott Diagnostic TDx). The average age of the subjects was 27.4 +/- 4.7 years, and the individual smoking histories ranged from 0.5 to 1.5 packs per day (average 0.89 +/- 0.33). The mean (+/- SD) body weight was 79.1 +/- 8.2 kg and all subjects were within 20% of their ideal body weight. Theophylline pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using noncompartmental analysis. ANOVA for repeated measures and Tukey's multiple comparison test were used for statistical analysis. The mean (+/- SD) theophylline clearance for each of the treatment groups was: 1.4 +/- 0.4, 1.2 +/- 0.3, and 1.2 +/- 0.2 ml/min/kg for phases A, B and C, respectively. Cimetidine decreased the clearance of theophylline, however, theophylline clearance was not statistically different between regimens B and C. Thus, the method of cimetidine administration (intermittent versus continuous infusion) did not influence the magnitude of the drug-drug interaction.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology