J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Luca, N
Right arrow Articles by Trimarco, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Luca, N
Right arrow Articles by Trimarco, B
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Effects of chronic antihypertensive treatment with ketanserin versus metoprolol on blood pressure and large arteries' compliance in humans: a cross-over double-blind study

N De Luca, G Rosiello, M Crispino, M Volpe, P Galletti, G Buzzetti, and B Trimarco

The antihypertensive efficacy of a serotonin-receptor antagonist, ketanserin, was compared with that of a well-established antihypertensive drug, metoprolol, and their cardiac and forearm hemodynamic effects were investigated using echocardiography and bidimensional pulsed Doppler flowmetry, respectively. Twenty hypertensive subjects completed a double-blind, cross-over, randomized study using ketanserin and metoprolol. Two 5-week courses with ketanserin or metoprolol were preceded by a placebo period; the total duration of the study was 15 weeks. Despite a comparable efficacy in reducing systolic and diastolic blood pressure (about 10% of the basal value), the two drugs showed quite different effects on forearm hemodynamics. Ketanserin increased forearm blood flow and induced a significant decrease in forearm vascular resistance (from 141 +/- 16 to 75 +/- 11 mm Hg/mL/sec, P less than .01). Furthermore, this treatment was able to improve brachial artery compliance (from 1.89 +/- .3 to 3.2 +/- .3 cm4/dyne 10(-7), P less than .01). On the contrary, metoprolol did not modify forearm hemodynamics. Both drugs did not significantly modify cardiac performance, as evaluated by left ventricle circumferential fiber shortening. Cardiac output was increased by ketanserin (from 5.9 +/- .3 to 6.6 +/- .5 L/min, P less than .05) and fell during treatment with metoprolol (from 5.9 +/- .4 to 4.9 +/- .3 L/min P less than .01). Thus, the two drugs reduce blood pressure through different hemodynamic mechanisms and the effects of ketanserin on systemic and peripheral circulation seem more favorable.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. P. Guerin, J. Blacher, B. Pannier, S. J. Marchais, M. E. Safar, and G. M. London
Impact of Aortic Stiffness Attenuation on Survival of Patients in End-Stage Renal Failure
Circulation, February 20, 2001; 103(7): 987 - 992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
L. M. Van Bortel, M. J. Kool, and H. A. Struijker Boudier
Effects of Antihypertensive Agents on Local Arterial Distensibility and Compliance
Hypertension, September 1, 1995; 26(3): 531 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology