J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lichstein, E
Right arrow Articles by Linet, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lichstein, E
Right arrow Articles by Linet, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Epoprostenol (prostacyclin) in unstable angina

E Lichstein, R Mendizabal, P Theroux, O Muller, JT Willerson, E Rapaport, BL Molk, and OI Linet

The purpose of this randomized, double-blind multicenter trial was to investigate the potential therapeutic effect of epoprostenol (prostacyclin, PGI2) in patients with unstable angina, as compared with placebo, and to investigate the safety of this agent. Of the 184 patients enrolled, 28 did not fit the study criteria; of the remaining 156 patients, 30 received prostacyclin in an open-label fashion. In the double-blind portion of the study, 63 patients each received prostacyclin or placebo. The drug or its vehicle was infused intravenously up to 5 ng/kg/min dose for 72 hours with a tapering off period for the last 12 hours. Both treatment groups from the double-blind portion were comparable in regard to the demographic data, length of infusion, and total dose received. There were no significant differences between the placebo and prostacyclin group in the following clinical endpoints: levels of cardiac enzymes throughout hospitalization period (with the exception of lower SGOT level in the prostacyclin group at day 2), and severity of angina (throughout the study), and at the end of the study (day 30). The number of patients who had congestive heart failure, new myocardial infarction, balloon pump insertion, coronary artery bypass grafting, or percutaneous coronary angioplasty was similar in both groups. Similar results in regard to the efficacy endpoints were also apparent in the prostacyclin group that was treated under open-label fashion. There was also no difference in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional status at the end of the double-blind study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology