J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mehlisch, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mehlisch, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1988; 28:S29-S33
© 1988 the American College of Clinical Pharmacology


Articles

Ketoprofen, ibuprofen, and placebo in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea: a double-blind crossover comparison

DR Mehlisch

Under double-blind, crossover conditions, 43 women with primary dysmenorrhea received ketoprofen, ibuprofen, and placebo during three consecutive menstrual cycles. Pain intensity and pain relief were determined before and for 6 hours after the loading dose (ketoprofen 150 mg, ibuprofen 800 mg) and before and 2 hours after the maintenance dose (ketoprofen 75 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg). Mean pain intensity difference and pain relief scores consistently indicated greater pain relief after the loading doses of ketoprofen and ibuprofen than after placebo. Significant (P less than 0.05) mean changes that were measured by 13 indices of analgesia after the loading doses of both ketoprofen and ibuprofen indicated greater efficacy for the active treatments than for placebo. The patients' global evaluations after the loading doses were significantly (P less than 0.05) better for the active treatments than for placebo. The efficacy results were similar after the maintenance doses. The rates of a "good" to "excellent" response were 77% for ketoprofen, 73% for ibuprofen, and 35% for placebo. Ketoprofen and ibuprofen were equally well tolerated, the most frequent adverse experiences being gastrointestinal symptoms for ketoprofen and central nervous system side effects for ibuprofen.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology