J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clifton, G.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clifton, G.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

The pharmacokinetics of oral isradipine in normal volunteers

GD Clifton, RA Blouin, C Dilea, HF Schran, AE Hassell, LM Gonasun, and TS Foster

The pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of oral isradipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocking agent, were determined in 42 normal male volunteers participating in two separate studies. Eighteen of the subjects received 2.5-, 5-, and 10-mg oral doses of isradipine solution (Study 1). The remaining 24 subjects received four 2.5-mg capsules, one 10-mg capsule, and 10 mg of isradipine as an oral solution (Study 2). Venous blood samples were obtained prior to and at frequent intervals after administration of each dose form. Plasma isradipine concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. No significant dose effect occurred with respect to any pharmacokinetic parameter except AUC and Cmax in Study 1. In Study 2, Cmax, tmax, and MRT were significantly different after the solution compared with the capsular formulations. The respective pharmacokinetic parameters (mean +/- SD) for the 10-mg solution and 10-mg capsule in Study 2 were time to maximum concentration, 0.40 +/- .28 and 1.57 +/- 0.44 hours; oral clearance, 284.9 +/- 105.3 and 317.0 +/- 138.4 L/hr; elimination half-life, 5.36 +/- 1.8 and 6.63 +/- 2.4 hrs, respectively. Headache, dizziness, and tachycardia were the most frequent adverse effects in both studies.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
D. M. Cummings, P. Amadio Jr, L. Nelson, and J. M. Fitzgerald
The Role of Calcium Channel Blockers in the Treatment of Essential Hypertension
Arch Intern Med, February 1, 1991; 151(2): 250 - 259.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology