J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kochar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Olzinski, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kochar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Olzinski, P
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

A 52-week comparison of lisinopril, hydrochlorothiazide, and their combination in hypertension

MS Kochar, G Bolek, JH Kalbfleisch, and P Olzinski

Lisinopril is a long-acting converting-enzyme inhibitor. A 52-week study was undertaken to compare the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of lisinopril, hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), and a combination of the two drugs in 24 patients with a sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 90 to 120 mm Hg. After a four-week single-blind placebo-washout phase, ten patients received lisinopril, ten received HCTZ, and four received the combination in increasing doses in a double-blind fashion for the next 12 weeks. The target blood pressure was less than 90 mm Hg DBP and a decrease of at least 10 mm Hg. For the next 12 weeks, the responders continued to receive the same medications; however, the nonresponders from the two groups received the combination, increasing the number of patients receiving both to 13. The DBP was controlled in eight of the ten patients with lisinopril, three of the ten patients with HCTZ, and 11 of 13 (four original and nine nonresponders) with the combination. For the next 28 weeks, 17 patients agreed to continue into a single-blind phase, during which blood pressure was controlled in six of the seven patients who were treated with lisinopril alone and nine of ten who received the combination. The heart rate rose significantly in the HCTZ-treated patients during the short-term treatment and decreased significantly in those treated with lisinopril during the long-term phase. Side effects were more frequent in patients receiving the combination but were always mild and subsided spontaneously. Lisinopril appeared to be more effective than HCTZ as a step-1 drug, and the combination was superior to either agent alone.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. G. Chrysant and The Lisinopril-Hydrochlorothiazide Group
Antihypertensive Effectiveness of Low-Dose Lisinopril-Hydrochlorothiazide Combination: A Large Multicenter Study
Arch Intern Med, April 11, 1994; 154(7): 737 - 743.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology