J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wollersheim, H
Right arrow Articles by van 't Laar, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wollersheim, H
Right arrow Articles by van 't Laar, A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Nifedipine in primary Raynaud's phenomenon and in scleroderma: oral versus sublingual hemodynamic effects

H Wollersheim, T Thien, and A van 't Laar

In 16 patients with Raynaud's phenomenon a placebo-controlled single-dose study was performed on the hemodynamic effects of 10 mg nifedipine, sublingually administered, followed by an open eight-week study on the therapeutic efficacy of chronic oral nifedipine, 10 mg qid. After the acute sublingual nifedipine administration, a pronounced objective improvement of finger skin (P = .013) and forearm muscle blood flow (P = .04) during a standard finger-cooling test was found. During the chronic oral study the improvement in objective efficacy parameters disappeared, except for laser Doppler estimated shunt flow (P = .07). The acute hemodynamic effects did not predict the long-term results in individual patients. Patients with systemic sclerosis reacted as well as patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon. This study shows that orally administered nifedipine does not convey long-term objective benefit to patients with Raynaud's phenomenon. The apparent increase in vasodilation during acute administration suggests that sublingual nifedipine prophylactically or during a vasospastic attack may be more useful.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
S. M. A. Fontenelle, C. Kayser, M. L. C. Pucinelli, and L. E. C. Andrade
Cold stimulus fingertip lacticemy test an effective method to monitor acute therapeutic intervention on primary Raynaud's phenomenon and systemic sclerosis
Rheumatology, January 1, 2008; 47(1): 80 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
A. E. Thompson and J. E. Pope
Calcium channel blockers for primary Raynaud's phenomenon: a meta-analysis
Rheumatology, February 1, 2005; 44(2): 145 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
T. J. M. Cleophas and M. G. Niemeyer
Raynaud's Syndrome, an Enigma After 130 Years
Angiology, March 1, 1993; 44(3): 196 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology