J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Weidler, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Weidler, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of long-acting propranolol 60-mg capsules: a comparative evaluation

MR Marino, M Dey, DC Garg, NS Jallad, DM Dorick, JJ Martinez, and DJ Weidler

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-period cross-over study was undertaken to evaluate the sustained-release characteristics of long-acting propranolol hydrochloride (Inderal LA, Ayerst Laboratories, New York, NY) 60 mg qd, to compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of this formulation with conventional propranolol 20 mg tid, and to evaluate the proportionality of long-acting propranolol 60 mg (LA 60 mg) and long-acting propranolol 80 mg (LA 80 mg). Pharmacodynamic effects were evaluated in 34 healthy subjects by assessing heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and the product of heart rate and systolic blood pressure (double product) after exercise-induced tachycardia following both acute (day 1) and steady state (day 4) drug administration. The Cmax following administration of LA 60 mg was 9.5 and 11.4 ng/mL on days 1 and 4, respectively, compared with 18.8 and 20.0 ng/mL with 20 mg tid (P less than .0001). The tmax for LA 60 mg was significantly later (P less than .0001) than for conventional propranolol. Additionally, the apparent plasma half-life was significantly longer (P less than .0001) than with conventional propranolol. The LA 60-mg formulation was dose proportional to the LA 80-mg formulation. Pharmacodynamic evaluations showed no significant differences between LA 60 mg and 20 mg tid at any times tested with either acute or steady state dosing. This study demonstrates that LA 60 mg displays characteristics of a sustained-release formulation, is proportional with LA 80 mg, and produces pharmacodynamic effects that are similar to 20-mg tid dosing.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology