J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Whitney CC
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Whitney CC, , Jr
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

The disposition and bioavailability of intravenous and oral nalbuphine in healthy volunteers

MW Lo, WL Schary, and Whitney CC Jr

The pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral nalbuphine were studied in 24 healthy male volunteers ranging in age from 21 to 30 years. On separate test days over a five-week period, subjects received single doses of each of four different formulations of nalbuphine, with a one-week washout period between treatments: 10 mg intravenously administered over two minutes, 45 mg orally given as a solution, and 45 mg orally administered in two tablet formulations (formulation A and formulation B). Blood samples were collected over 48 hours postadministration, and plasma nalbuphine concentrations were determined by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with electrochemical detection. The mean nalbuphine plasma concentration five minutes after 10 mg intravenously was 53 ng/mL, and the half-life of nalbuphine with this route of administration was 2.3 hours. In contrast, mean maximum nalbuphine concentrations (Cmax) after the three orally administered preparations ranged from 14.4 to 15.5 ng/mL, and occurred 0.9 to 1.2 hours after dose administration. Mean elimination half-lives after administration of the three nalbuphine oral formulations were essentially identical, ranging from 6.9 to 7.7 hours. Nalbuphine plasma concentration curves decayed biexponentially regardless of route of administration or type of formulation. Absolute bioavailability of the orally administered forms of nalbuphine ranged from 16.4 to 17.4% and Cmax and AUC data further established the bioequivalence of the three oral formulations. The low absolute bioavailability and prolonged elimination half-life of nalbuphine associated with oral administration are likely due to extensive first-pass metabolism and enterohepatic circulation, respectively.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
L.-H. Pao, C.-H. Hsiong, O. Y.-P. Hu, J.-J. Wang, and S.-T. Ho
IN VITRO AND IN VIVO EVALUATION OF THE METABOLISM AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF SEBACOYL DINALBUPHINE
Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2005; 33(3): 395 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology