J Clin Pharmacol Click here to register for online access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hurwitz, A
Right arrow Articles by Burns, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hurwitz, A
Right arrow Articles by Burns, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Articles

Theophylline absorption from sustained-release products: comparative steady-state bioavailability of once-daily Theo-Dur, Theo-24, and Uniphyl

A Hurwitz, A Karim, and TS Burns

Theophylline absorption from three sustained-release formulations was evaluated in 18 healthy men. First, a 600-mg oral dose of aminophylline, a rapidly absorbed formulation, was studied to confirm that theophylline clearance was in the expected range (mean +/- SD, 0.710 +/- 0.096 mL/min/kg), t1/2 = 6.9 +/- 1.1 hr. Then each of the three sustained-release formulations was given at one hour before breakfast for eight days to achieve steady state. Multiple blood samples were drawn on days 7 and 8 over two complete dosing intervals. After a six-day drug-free period each subject was crossed over to the next product. At steady state, mean fluctuations of serum theophylline levels were more than 200% with Theo-Dur (Key Pharmaceuticals, Miami, FL), more than 150% with Uniphyl (Purdue-Frederick, Norwalk, CT), and about 75% with Theo-24 (Searle Laboratories, Chicago, IL). Theophylline Cmax levels averaged 16.5 micrograms/mL after 900 mg Theo-Dur, with 8% exceeding 20 micrograms/mL. Despite these high peak levels, nearly half of the Cmin levels were below 5 micrograms/mL. Uniphyl administration resulted in three-fourths of trough levels to be at 5 micrograms/mL or lower. Peak levels from 800-mg daily doses of Uniphyl were also low, with 42% never reaching 10 micrograms/mL. With Theo-24 only 17% of trough levels were below 5 micrograms/mL, as compared to 47% with Theo-Dur and 72% with Uniphyl. The three products differed in the areas under the serum concentration-time curves (AUC), which reflect bioavailability. Theo-Dur AUC was nearly equivalent to that of rapidly absorbed aminophylline (when adjusted for dosage).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology