J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garrett, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garrett, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Lofexidine in the treatment of hypertension: a twice-daily versus one-daily dose comparison with 24-hour blood pressure monitoring

BN Garrett and NM Kaplan

Lofexidine, an antihypertensive imidazoline derivative, was given to ten hypertensives on both a twice-daily and once-daily regimen, using routine blood pressure measurements and 24-hour Remler recording. Plasma renin activity and catecholamines were measured. After a dose titration with twice-daily doses, the total twice-daily dose was given once daily for two weeks and the drug abruptly withdrawn. Mean placebo blood pressure was 136/104 mm Hg supine. After twice-daily therapy, this fell to 118/86 mm Hg, and upon conversion to once-daily therapy, it rose to 126/89 mm Hg. With the Remler recorder, mean 24-hour blood pressure was 125/89 during the twice-daily therapy, 133/94 mm Hg during once-daily therapy, and 142/99 mm Hg on the day after acute withdrawal; i.e., evaluation in all three treatment periods showed a lack of sustained control with both a wide range and high frequency of blood pressure variation. Plasma renin activity and plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine did not change significantly during the study.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. I. M. Drayer, M. A. Weber, and W. J. Hoeger
Whole-Day BP Monitoring in Ambulatory Normotensive Men
Arch Intern Med, February 1, 1985; 145(2): 271 - 274.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. I. M. Drayer, M. A. Weber, J. L. DeYoung, and D. D. Brewer
Long-term BP Monitoring in the Evaluation of Antihypertensive Therapy
Arch Intern Med, May 1, 1983; 143(5): 898 - 901.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology