J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ciccolunghi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chaudri, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ciccolunghi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chaudri, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Interpretation of hematological and biochemical laboratory data in large-scale, multicenter clinical trials

SN Ciccolunghi, PD Fowler, and MJ Chaudri

The laboratory assessment of drug tolerability is central to a long-term trial. But because of its volume, its multicenter origin, and the importance of nondrug factors, the analysis of these data is complicated. Various methods, i.e., collection of investigators' opinion, comparison of before- and after-treatment means, and analysis of transitions, were found to be unsatisfactory. A fourth method, described in this paper, seems to be more promising. An initial computer screening of the laboratory data is conducted to identify all patients with the potentially clinically relevant laboratory abnormalities. Each laboratory abnormally is then examined by the pharmaceutical physician with regard to the patient's sex and age, the trial diagnosis, concomitant and intercurrent illnesses, concurrent medication, unwanted effects, and other laboratory results, and each result is assigned a probable etiology according to a pre-defined classification system. By this method it is then possible to compare the frequency and severity of possible or probable drug-related laboratory abnormalities occurring with the various trial drugs. Our opinion regarding the importance of using this method would appear justified by the fact that a possible or probable drug effect was considered to have been responsible for only 15 per cent (112/760) of the potentially clinically relevant abnormal tests reported.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology