J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trautlein, J
Right arrow Articles by Gillin, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trautlein, J
Right arrow Articles by Gillin, M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1976; 16:361-366
© 1976 the American College of Clinical Pharmacology


Articles

A long-term study of low-dose aerosolized terbutaline sulfate

J Trautlein, J Allegra, and M Gillin

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new lowdose terbutaline sulfate aerosol (375 micrograms) over a six-week period. The question of drug tolerance was also evaluated. Twenty-four ambulant patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with a component of reversible airway disease was evaluated. The patients were tested at two-week intervals during a six-week period. The patients abstained from all bronchodilatory medications for at least 10 hours prior to the time of evaluation. The evaluation consisted of baseline FEV1 and MMEFR determinations, ECG, CBC, urinalysis, and renal and liver function tests. After the terbutaline was administered, a rhythm strip and pulmonary function tests were repeated at 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes. Throughout the six-week study there was a statistically significant increase in FEV1 and MMEFR, (P less than 0.001). No change was noted in the systolic blood pressures; however, heart rate and diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly. No drug tolerance, paradoxical bronchospasm, subjective side effects, no abnormal laboratory results were noted during the study period.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. J. Trautlein
Sustained Effectiveness of Terbutaline
JAMA, April 28, 1978; 239(17): 1744 - 1744.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
J. J. Trautlein
Correspondence: Aerosolized Terbutaline in Exercise-Induced Bronchospasm
J. Clin. Pharmacol., April 1, 1977; 17(4): 267 - 268.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology