J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1975; 15:734-751
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smolen, V. F.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smolen, V. F.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, E. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Pharmacological Response Data for Comparative Bioavailability Studies of Chlorpromazine Oral Dosage Forms in Humans: I. Pupilometry

V. F. Smolen Ph.D.1, H. R. Murdock JR. Ph.D.2, W. P. Stoltman B.S.3, J. W. Clevenger B.S.3, L. W. Combs M.D.3, and E. J. Williams Ph.D3

1 Department of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907.
2 Division of Biopharmaceutics, Bureau of Drugs, United States Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
3 Interdisciplinary Drug Engineering and Assessment Laboratory (IDEAL), School of Pharmacy and Pharmacal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907.

Owing to the insensitivity of even the presently best chemical or radiological assay procedures, it is not feasible to perform comparative bioavailability studies of chlorpromazine oral drug products using blood or urine sampling; this is particularly the case for oral doses below 100-150 mg/70 kg. In contrast, the use of temporal miotic response data, which correlates with blood levels of unchanged drug, permits dose-response vs time profiles to be recorded with oral dose levels as low as 5-10 mg/70 kg. The monitoring of pupilometric data in up to 16 human volunteers demonstrated a sensitivity to both extents and rates of chlorpromazine bioavailability and revealed differences to exist between liquid and solid oral dosage forms of chlorpromazine.

Note:

The excellent advice and technical assistance of Dr. John Harter (Food and Drug Administration), Ms. Anne McKenzie, Mr. Edward Bronson, Ms. Christi Knevel, and Ms. Judy Bowker is gratefully acknowledged.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology