J Clin Pharmacol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and New Drugs, 1970; 10:153-160
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rickels, K.
Right arrow Articles by Briscoe, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rickels, K.
Right arrow Articles by Briscoe, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Assessment of Dosage Deviation In Outpatient Drug Research

Karl Rickels M.D.1 and Elizabeth Briscoe B.A.2

1 Philadelphia General Hospital; University of Pennsylvania.
2 Philadelphia General Hospital.

A review of the literature reveals three methods commonly employed for measuring dosage deviation : urine analyses, pill counts of medication remaining after a period of treatment, and patients' verbal reports of medication taken. Researchers have found urine analysis limited as an indication of degree of deviation despite its objectivity and the verbal report inaccurate in comparison to both urine tests and pill counts. Some evidence suggests that verbal reports are more accurate in cases of major deviation. Six hundred and seventy-five pill counts and verbal reports were compared for neurotic outpatients grouped according to population (hospital clinic and general practice), drug, and number of pills making up their daily dosage. Across these groups verbal reports generally indicated less deviation from prescribed dosage than did pill counts. Discrepancies between the two measures occurred most often when deviation was slight and relatively infrequently when deviation was large. Though generally less accurate, verbal reports do not appear to be seriously in error when deviation is large.

Note:

The authors wish to express their appreciation to Drs. E. L. Clark, F. J. Phillips, and L. Sablosky, who collected the private practice data, as well as to the many physicians from the Psychopharmacology Research Unit of Philadelphia General Hospital who contributed data for this study.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
R. Holland, I. Brooksby, E. Lenaghan, K. Ashton, L. Hay, R. Smith, L. Shepstone, A. Lipp, C. Daly, A. Howe, et al.
Effectiveness of visits from community pharmacists for patients with heart failure: HeartMed randomised controlled trial
BMJ, May 26, 2007; 334(7603): 1098 - 1098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
S. A Vik, C. J Maxwell, and D. B Hogan
Measurement, Correlates, and Health Outcomes of Medication Adherence Among Seniors
Ann. Pharmacother., February 1, 2004; 38(2): 303 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
G. C. Lamb, S. S. Green, and J. Heron
Can Physicians Warn Patients of Potential Side Effects Without Fear of Causing Those Side Effects?
Arch Intern Med, December 12, 1994; 154(23): 2753 - 2756.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
S. A. ERAKER, J. P. KIRSCHT, and M. H. BECKER
Understanding and Improving Patient Compliance
Ann Intern Med, February 1, 1984; 100(2): 258 - 268.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1970 by the American College of Clinical Pharmacology